12 April 2008

EU Demands More Say In Global Economy

This was amusing in several ways.  Mostly, the headline about "demanding" more say in the global economy.  European Union countries seem pretty good about demanding things from the United States when they should be thanking us for propping up their economies.

The euro is now second to the weak U.S. dollar as a reserve currency held by foreign investors and has risen sharply against the dollar in recent months, hitting a new all-time high of $1.5912 on Thursday.

Almunia said the euro area is now "playing an increasingly important role in supporting the stability of the world economy and the global financial system."

So the "weak dollar" is still the primary currency held by foreign investors?  Why would they want to hang onto reserves in a currency headed for recession/depression/global meltdown? 

He again signaled worry about the U.S.' huge current account deficit, saying a sudden "unwinding" could hit Europe hard, since its currency is still appreciating against the dollar.

Then maybe ripping into the United States and constantly trying to undermine confidence in the economy isn't such a great idea?  Just sayin'

The EU official called for the 15 euro nations to share a single seat when world leaders meet to discuss the economy at the International Monetary Fund or the G-7 group of top seven industrialized nations.

In the G-7, this would come at the expense of euro users Germany, France and Italy which now represent themselves at these talks.

Wonder why they didn't mention the United Kingdom?  They're part of the EU and the G7.  Do they keep their own seat?  Or maybe they're not quite on board with this idea because it sucks and the author wants to conveniently "overlook" this?

Demand all you like EU.  The United States loves people who demand things from them.  If you want more say in the global economy, fixing your own might be a good start.

Posted by: Stashiu3 at 12:44:36 | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 323 words, total size 2 kb.

1 "the 15 euro nations" do not include the UK.  At least, not yet.
Last I checked--a couple of weeks ago--the British pound was up to almost $2USD.  By contrast, ten years ago, it fetched in dollars roughly the same as the euro fetches now or a little more ($1.59-1.64 USD when I was on vacation there in the early 90s--last time I've been overseas).

Whether this is just a technical way of snubbing the UK, or whether the currency based view of the G7/IMF makes sense, I'm not enough of an economist to say.

Posted by: kishnevi at 12 April 2008@15:06:24 (FFHuv)

2 But it's the EU calling for this.  Why just single out a sub-group (which I thought was against the whole point of having a union, btw)?  The United Kingdom has refused to switch to the Euro for a reason.  This is just a transparent attempt to inflate the importance of the Euro to the global economy and gain influence.  I say they can go pound sand for all I care.  They need us, not the other way around... it's pretty stupid for them to be demanding anything.  We always have to "request" or "suggest" unless we are ready to be accused of arrogance.  Why doesn't it work the other way?

Posted by: Stashiu3 at 12 April 2008@15:16:23 (tarqT)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

Number of Unique Visits Since 08 March 2008



21kb generated in CPU 0.012, elapsed 0.0592 seconds.
60 queries taking 0.0508 seconds, 102 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.