21 March 2008
Then, you have the driving:
And now, natural disasters:
Why would we want to go there anyway? Their economy is in great shape because they learned from us and have opened up their markets. Supporting it hurts our own interests. Do we really want to continue supporting that growth so their government can continue their military buildup and continue their oppressive policies?
China should not have been awarded the Olympics in the first place. Why reward them, and the idiots who made the decision, by helping the Games go smoothly? Skip the Opening Ceremonies at least... but it wouldn't bother me if the only ones to show were China, Iran, North Korea, Syria, etc... When the Games became professionalized, they lost all real meaning anyway.
Posted by: Stashiu3 at
16:07:39
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
Post contains 266 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@16:17:37 (yFIK0)

Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@16:27:50 (Q5ggV)
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@16:52:54 (yFIK0)
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@16:57:40 (yFIK0)
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@16:58:19 (yFIK0)
Is that really the word you want to use?

Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@17:09:20 (Q5ggV)
Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@17:11:22 (Q5ggV)
Harper may have to chastise you severely for that picture. And you call ME wrong. The first time I saw that I threw up a little in my mouth.
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@17:24:38 (yFIK0)
Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@19:02:40 (Q5ggV)
I do find it interesting that they have enough earthquakes to need an Earthquake authority.
You might find this interesting: Guy works on Princess Cruise ships (tech for their onboard revues) and blogs every so often about what he sees on port calls. This one starts with him joining the ship in Shanghai.
http://endoftheearth.livejournal.com/56710.html
I have to admit, China is the one Communist/ex Communist country that would interest me enough to visit, because of the scenery and culture.
Posted by: kishnevi at 21 March 2008@19:39:28 (ZV7t1)
If I were able to visit Hong Kong, I would probably go. Mainland China would get a pass without a lot of changes first. I guess if they want me to visit, they'd best get started.

Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@19:58:42 (Q5ggV)
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@20:05:34 (yFIK0)
If it's any comfort, I'll admit that my Google Image Search was for "Hillary Nude" and some of the Photoshops were ... startling... so we both threw up a bit on that one.

Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@20:18:40 (Q5ggV)
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@20:34:50 (yFIK0)
Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@20:39:09 (Q5ggV)
I will be in that group. For one on the few times in my life I will be mainstream!
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@20:41:56 (yFIK0)
Posted by: DRJ at 21 March 2008@20:44:50 (wE7Og)
Honestly, I would assume I was monitored everywhere in China or Russia anyway. The logistics of actually doing it are impossible of course, but it would be the only safe course. Privacy anywhere is never absolutely assured.
The safety issues in your link are much more persuasive. Interesting how they have funds and resources for monitoring, but lack the funds for adequate locks, fire and CO2 alarms, and other emergency essentials.
Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@20:53:52 (Q5ggV)
Posted by: Machinist at 21 March 2008@21:18:03 (yFIK0)
Posted by: Stashiu3 at 21 March 2008@21:34:08 (Q5ggV)
Number of Unique Visits Since 08 March 2008
60 queries taking 0.0501 seconds, 120 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.